Making a movie. Disc space?
Moderator: Moderators
Making a movie. Disc space?
Okay, so since everyone wants help with jumps and stuff, I decided to make a movie.
In this movie it'll be clips of the most usefull jumps I know, the funniest, and hardest. So, basicly, all the jumps I know.
Anyway, before compiling, encoding, editing whatever, how much would.. Oh, I don't know, about 1 hour of RAW .avi use of my harddrive?
And what programs or Q2 clients are the best ones for exporting .dm2 into an windows-editable movie, like .avi or .mpeg?
Also, (I guess I could find the answer to this one in some turturial, but since I'm already asking so many other questions), what format is best?
DivX ? (how many pixels? 000x000 ? version? other specs?)
XviD ?
.mpeg4 ?
.mp4?
(Windows Media Video) .wmv?
Please, share your knowledge :p
If it doesn't take to much discspace, maby I'll start rendering, exporting or whatever soon..
I haven't made a Q2 demo in years, and, well, the quality wasn't all that great.
Thanks beforehand.
- ^Proto
In this movie it'll be clips of the most usefull jumps I know, the funniest, and hardest. So, basicly, all the jumps I know.
Anyway, before compiling, encoding, editing whatever, how much would.. Oh, I don't know, about 1 hour of RAW .avi use of my harddrive?
And what programs or Q2 clients are the best ones for exporting .dm2 into an windows-editable movie, like .avi or .mpeg?
Also, (I guess I could find the answer to this one in some turturial, but since I'm already asking so many other questions), what format is best?
DivX ? (how many pixels? 000x000 ? version? other specs?)
XviD ?
.mpeg4 ?
.mp4?
(Windows Media Video) .wmv?
Please, share your knowledge :p
If it doesn't take to much discspace, maby I'll start rendering, exporting or whatever soon..
I haven't made a Q2 demo in years, and, well, the quality wasn't all that great.
Thanks beforehand.
- ^Proto
Plummet is my middle name..
dunno if it helps that much, but http://www.aq2suomi.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1867 by Woce and Masa :)
xvid is in these days, i think. hope to see a jumpin movie soon ;)
xvid is in these days, i think. hope to see a jumpin movie soon ;)
Sync' imeiz - AQ2Suomi & AQ2World forum moderator, part-time TATM-writer
when exporting it is like 10mb a second.
When encoding you want good quality at a low bit rate. I would use wmv9 cus its easiest to use and comes up with very good quality. Message me on msn for help in setting that up if u need help. (640x480)
Also use either beefquake or apprime quake. I would use apprime cus its just the simplest and cus its only for jumps would probably be the best.
When encoding you want good quality at a low bit rate. I would use wmv9 cus its easiest to use and comes up with very good quality. Message me on msn for help in setting that up if u need help. (640x480)
Also use either beefquake or apprime quake. I would use apprime cus its just the simplest and cus its only for jumps would probably be the best.
that would depend on what kind of resolution you are using... a video will take less discspace if you use a low resolution as opposed to a high one (duh!) I'm don't have a clue as to if you can choose the resolution for an avi-export from apr or beefquake yourself tho, never used the avi-export.arild wrote:raw avi takes 14,5mb /s if i remember correctly. Used to do that for me atlest.
-NRG
- depends also on framerate, colordepth and sound
- shure u can choose the resolution for avi-export in bq and apr, its the resolution u've set in before exporting
- my settings: uncomressed avi 640x480x32@25fps with uncompressed sound in q2 qualitly => 23 Mbyte / sek
- I'll advise DivX Pro as final codec, it provides imo slightly better performance (maybe just a subjective opinion, couse it simply has to, as the commercial version of it's little brother XviD), easier to use - has better interface and beautiful documentation
- after 6 Months Trial period u can change to XviD or reinstall ur whole system and use DivX Pro Trial again :-)
@new jupms only
A recammed simultan jumping performance mega show with old jumps would look nice :-)
- shure u can choose the resolution for avi-export in bq and apr, its the resolution u've set in before exporting
- my settings: uncomressed avi 640x480x32@25fps with uncompressed sound in q2 qualitly => 23 Mbyte / sek
- I'll advise DivX Pro as final codec, it provides imo slightly better performance (maybe just a subjective opinion, couse it simply has to, as the commercial version of it's little brother XviD), easier to use - has better interface and beautiful documentation
- after 6 Months Trial period u can change to XviD or reinstall ur whole system and use DivX Pro Trial again :-)
@new jupms only
A recammed simultan jumping performance mega show with old jumps would look nice :-)
Thanks for all the replies, oh, and for the guy who thought it wouldn't be any fun to watch all the old jumps again, uhm.. what can I say.. maby it'll be funnier to watch me do them? I don't know, but atleast now you'll get them all at one place.
And I promisse a few new moves I found myself, which I haven't seen anyone do, or shown anyone, so it should be worth it.
Guess I'll start exporting in a few weeks then, and making demos later this weekend.
thanks again..
And I promisse a few new moves I found myself, which I haven't seen anyone do, or shown anyone, so it should be worth it.
Guess I'll start exporting in a few weeks then, and making demos later this weekend.
thanks again..
Plummet is my middle name..
hey, i am wondering if much quality gets lost when you render every videopart two times. my new movie will probably becomes too long for my hdd to store, so i thought about rendering everything once to render everything in a second step together. Any comments?
Director of #E-Reality :: Sprayer of #koksnutten
-
- was flattened
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: cl
when I made "evolution", to save space, I encoded one time the uncompressed clips with the best quality settings in xvid... then i puted all togheter and then the last encode....... Didn`t have that much quality loss... but if you don`t use the best quality the first encode, you can tell the quality loss...