Page 2 of 4

Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:59 pm
by Flunx
Bwhaha, put this in the fun section :)

Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 5:00 pm
by alekchi
More liek 1400 instead of 1399 B<
But I dont see why not to be polite and friendly in little things also, who does it hurt? Maybe its not worth of doing thread but atleast he (skmzie) is right, even though just a little, little bit. :?

Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 5:09 pm
by IBA
anything wrong with ur channels that u have to hide it ? :-D

Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 5:10 pm
by alekchi
#analgay and #kuwulickmybutthole

Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 5:13 pm
by IBA
thought something like this :)

Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 5:27 pm
by Clause
Jazzie wrote: what if they end up in cott due to this particular matter?
lol :D

Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 5:28 pm
by nufan
anyway...
its not like its such a big difference between uo and off..
but if they added a uoff cw and wanted to play a uoff cw, its not supose to be in the topic or the website. imo

seems to me that evryone try's to be even more cooler then skmzie, sad :(

Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 6:27 pm
by mirror
this guy really knows how to make a fool out of himself, respect

Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 7:13 pm
by stan0x
yea :bday:


he sux :P

Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 12:14 am
by emu
whats the diff in a uo and a off cw ? u play just the same ? :\ didn't ppl stop playing up back in like 1980 ?

Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 1:08 am
by taulutussi
Make avatar size restrictions plz :bday:

Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 2:37 am
by kaaos
who the fuck cares if it's an official or unofficial match?

IT'S JUST A GAME FFS.

Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 2:55 am
by pliksu
kaaos wrote:who the f#ck cares if it's an official or unofficial match?

IT'S JUST A GAME FFS.
aww, god how objective your critisism is. (and no, it's not just you) I mean, if it's really just a game, how about not marking it as an official? I've had some differences in views with Tlx before (and I honestly think that dude's got some serious issues), so who am I to say anything about objective critisism. Maybe I should just shut up. Yeah, I'll do that. Nevermind.

Edit: Seems like Nufan's got a point.

Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 3:14 am
by angra
holy mother of christ.
i just realized that ankat's war statistics show one victory too much. They should have 313, not 314. what if they end up in cott due to this particular matter?
Oh my GOOOOD, lets call the somebody! :)

Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 3:21 am
by MadWolf
IMO there's not any diffrence between uo and off, it's a cw anyway. But in this case when you challenged them to an unoofficial clanwar, they should atleast mark on their hp that it was an uo.