Page 2 of 3
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:18 pm
by aka
how about not banning players that have'nt cheated?
<--
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:15 pm
by Samislide
daddynufan B>
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 8:29 pm
by nufan
:DDDD <333
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 5:37 am
by Sovnig
aka wrote:how about not banning players that have'nt cheated?
<--
Well the idea of my suggestion was to avoid such a thing
But I gotta admit there's better arguments con than pro, so I guess you'll stay banned
offtopic: am i the only one always reading "picmip bitch" as "picnic bitch" and fail to understand a single thing of it?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 5:55 am
by Jazzie
nufan I think he was just warned. But I couldn't resist the fun in the fact that the demo was even taken up for view :P
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 12:36 pm
by aka
And I cant resist the fun in the fact that my demos was even taken up for a view
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 12:52 pm
by W1lco
Omfg.. WHY DONT WE GET ANY ACTIVE ADMINS? Cant we start with that instead of catching "bad people" at demos? Or maybe this is the only way to do it?, ( to bust a cheater ).. last 3 times when i have been very suspect ( vs Fakeclan ), i wanted to contact a admin, 2times at a friday evening, one just middle of the weekend, about 19.00.. and no BT for this time, answered.. My opinion is that we first should get SOME "active" admins..
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 10:57 pm
by aka
we should get some sane admins
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 1:11 am
by angra
W1lco wrote:Omfg.. WHY DONT WE GET ANY ACTIVE ADMINS? Cant we start with that instead of catching "bad people" at demos? Or maybe this is the only way to do it?, ( to bust a cheater ).. last 3 times when i have been very suspect ( vs Fakeclan ), i wanted to contact a admin, 2times at a friday evening, one just middle of the weekend, about 19.00.. and no BT for this time, answered.. My opinion is that we first should get SOME "active" admins..
You can't expect admins to be there at every sec, ppl have other things to do to, girls, work, friends and so on.
In my case i don't have time for aq now at all almost, so when i get time to play i don't feel like specing a cw for 40 mins.
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:38 am
by Serra
No way. 90% believed that skmz cheated, eventhough the demo isnt obvious and i think that's fucked. There are people who gets fragged and are like "wtf, lame cheater motherfucker ill kick your ass IRL" and would vote yes
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:53 am
by Den
Well there are others reasons why people call skmz a cheater
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:08 am
by minchiano
angra wrote:W1lco wrote:Omfg.. WHY DONT WE GET ANY ACTIVE ADMINS? Cant we start with that instead of catching "bad people" at demos? Or maybe this is the only way to do it?, ( to bust a cheater ).. last 3 times when i have been very suspect ( vs Fakeclan ), i wanted to contact a admin, 2times at a friday evening, one just middle of the weekend, about 19.00.. and no BT for this time, answered.. My opinion is that we first should get SOME "active" admins..
You can't expect admins to be there at every sec, ppl have other things to do to, girls, work, friends and so on.
In my case i don't have time for aq now at all almost, so when i get time to play i don't feel like specing a cw for 40 mins.
Word angra. I for one would like to see the bot back in the channel, hope it'll be fixed soon. Then you can check the ip's and maybe demos and screens when you DO have time.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:17 am
by aka
You can't expect admins to be there at every sec, ppl have other things to do to, girls, work, friends and so on.
who are you trying to fool?[/b]
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 8:10 am
by angra
aka please you are sooooo sooooo soooo boring.
ohh i forgot to tell you. you have been added to a lifetime ban at angra.se i hope you will have a nice stay there.
why? ahhhhhhh don't like you. have a nice day everyone.
ps. this has nothing to do with the post you just wrote here.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 9:31 am
by Samislide
I wouldnt mind getting banned there aswell, a nice excuse to not play cw's in that shitserver ^^