Page 3 of 7
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 9:05 am
by Endy
Da^JuaN wrote:About long rounds, i remember last naql season with smt camping out aggression, dont remember how many rounds it was but not much at least
Oh plz... sMt were not the only ones who were camping aggression... Wasn't it sMt against Apprime that match or something? they both camped equally, and it was a shame to see (while the (c) vs -D- game had like 35 rounds their game had like 10)
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 9:37 am
by Da^JuaN
Yea Apr was camping too, since they lost all their rounds when they attacked.. not weird to camp then too though
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 9:38 am
by birdie
Perhaps he meant soho where we managed to beat .kfl with not-so-short rounds? ;)
That apr vs smt aggression was quite entertaining imo, it was like 'CAMP!! I HIT APR/**** TO THE KEVLAR VEST' and the rtl goes over...
The funny thing was that both did the same thing in every round :)
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:42 am
by MrOfficer
Well, for a match 2*20 mins with least rounds.....
[AMB] vs =DI= in BWAQSL Season 5 (or 6)
as =DI= was well known for...."tactical playing" the game was very slow
Urban 5:4
Teamjungle 6:3
Making a total of 18 rounds, with a timelimit of 3 Mins, most of the rounds decided by RTL
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:53 pm
by WizardExt
I remember playing a long and dramatic league match with [M.I] on the map subway. Maybe it was against jÄgarna. Couldn't have been too many rounds.
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:55 pm
by Saboteur
I took excellent vs. sC' (quad) thats something to bite on.
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:26 pm
by Diivil
Saboteur wrote:I took excellent vs. sC' (quad) thats something to bite on.
I got vs winning obsession in cliff2 in boomtown with m4 :]
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:45 am
by alekchi
angra wrote:alekchi wrote:nice idea but I dont think guinness forgot, they probably just dont care about aq2.
Do i need to write [IRONY] behind the topic? =)
I just forgot [JOKE] if u didnt get it B<
it is the most funniest joke to get serious when someone says something like that. and now you can answer "no, its not" and I should be like ":( d0h"
=A= lamorz
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:56 am
by Clown
Jokes aren't funny when you have to explain them.
Also, I approve if this thread. Maybe we can get an IRC-stats style thing going on.
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:01 pm
by Clavven
Saboteur wrote:I took excellent vs. sC' (quad) thats something to bite on.
roofwanker
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:19 pm
by Blue Vex
The picture i posted also displays most frags in a 4on4 cw. Furuli is my surrname.
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 8:00 am
by iler
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 8:33 am
by Tactics
gah, CI5 has 1375
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:19 pm
by alekchi
Clown wrote:Jokes aren't funny when you have to explain them.
yes they are
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:44 pm
by kaaos
yeah.. so you come here often?