Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:09 pm
it doesn't make coffee.Den wrote:ehh silly high? come onwhat you expect with "next-gen" gfx
Page 4 of 5
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:15 pm
eeh Den? it honestly isn't that impressive for those requirements...
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:17 pm
...and also. it's not really that "wow" since it builds from the base where doom3 left off.
i just want to know what kind of machine I would need to have for an okey experience.
i just want to know what kind of machine I would need to have for an okey experience.
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:46 pm
If you never played any other game than q2 then yes, the requirements are pretty high.. Most games released this year have those requirements.WizardExt wrote:eeh Den? it honestly isn't that impressive for those requirements...
Oh you really shouldnt buy it, if you dont have a proper dx9 card (yes that means you, you FX5200 users
)Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:09 am
Too goddamn heavy for my comp.
P4 2,4GHz, 512MB, GF4 TI4200.
640x480, low quality -> Running smooth, but any "big" activity in the game (explosion, gas, whatever) makes it sticky.
P4 2,4GHz, 512MB, GF4 TI4200.
640x480, low quality -> Running smooth, but any "big" activity in the game (explosion, gas, whatever) makes it sticky.
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:41 am
would guess that that's caused by that ti4200MadWolf wrote:Too goddamn heavy for my comp.
P4 2,4GHz, 512MB, GF4 TI4200.
640x480, low quality -> Running smooth, but any "big" activity in the game (explosion, gas, whatever) makes it sticky.
(:( because I have one of those too...)Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:04 am
some one of u peepers has tryed out in multiplayer? 
how it works?
and, sorry me, last question:
gef4 ti4200 is better then mine gef3 ti200, isn't it?
how it works?
and, sorry me, last question:
gef4 ti4200 is better then mine gef3 ti200, isn't it?
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:20 am
that would be a YESBeAViS wrote:and, sorry me, last question:
gef4 ti4200 is better then mine gef3 ti200, isn't it?
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:19 am
NRGizeR wrote:that would be a YESBeAViS wrote:and, sorry me, last question:
gef4 ti4200 is better then mine gef3 ti200, isn't it?
grrrrrrr... my computer is getting old... i should change it
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 3:18 pm
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 1:34 pm
yeah looks like, but i never really liked q3mp, and this looks like it. just more good lookin. quite same weapons (rail and so on, one copyed from ut [the disk launcher]).
bah. i dont know what to think. we'll test it
bah. i dont know what to think. we'll test it
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 1:41 pm
cara!!!! but ur avatar is the "E" letter of the keyboard with the euro symbol that looks like q2 one.
i take a month of activity to understand that.
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:55 am
no well i have to be honest: i tested it for 40 seconds in single, and in 800.600 @ minimum detail it works fine.
but there were no ppl in servers to test it online grrrr
i wont play singleplayer anymore, i'm waiting someone to playonline
ps:it isnt still supported from ase loll
but there were no ppl in servers to test it online
grrrri wont play singleplayer anymore, i'm waiting someone to playonline
ps:it isnt still supported from ase loll
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm
IMO it's as good as Q3 was "out of the box". Maplist has alot of old remakes from Q2/Q3. And railgun is still a bad mother, I love it.BeAViS wrote:some one of u peepers has tryed out in multiplayer?
how it works?
Ecks announced last night that he's done with the coding on Q4 filter and that it will be uploaded today. We just have to be patient I guess.BeAViS wrote:ps:it isnt still supported from ase loll
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:29 am
o_O O_o Check again who has copied who. All the weapons have been introduced in previous Quakes, except dark matter gun which is kinda like BFG with dark ammo :p. If you mean by the disk launcher the nailgun, play q1 =(BeAViS wrote: quite same weapons (rail and so on, one copyed from ut [the disk launcher]).