[L.A]' Evoleet

Post by **dudemcpek** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:21 pm

Guilty until proven innocent. That's how it is (or should be?) in AQ2. How else will you prove someone's cheating if you can't even spectate him in a match? So bring on the evidence..

IBA · Post by **IBA** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:30 am

why should any1 record demos or use autorecord for a game he played for 8 years. For a lucky kill he made like it happend 2years ago to make a movie? i recorded so often when the opponent told me while playing the cw and afterwards they didnt even ask for it. i only record for cups where the rules say so since im not their dog.
Back to evo, he was never suspect to me.

skmz · Post by **skmz** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:42 am

IBA wrote:why should any1 record demos or use autorecord for a game he played for 8 years. For a lucky kill he made like it happend 2years ago to make a movie? i recorded so often when the opponent told me while playing the cw and afterwards they didnt even ask for it. i only record for cups where the rules say so since im not their dog.
Back to evo, he was never suspect to me.

Wasn't the point here that he said that he would record from the beginning? And if you agree on that, you automatically (in my opinion) agrees that you will send it with no whine afterwards if someone ask you to...?

What's the point to agree by recording if you're not going to send it anyways?

Mmf.

IBA · Post by **IBA** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:09 pm

maybe he agreed to it that they just shut up and dont spam RECORD or something

skmz · Post by **skmz** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:16 am

IBA wrote:maybe he agreed to it that they just shut up and dont spam RECORD or something

Maybe so, but that's his loss.

He's also responsible for his own actions.

Makkey · Post by **Makkey** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:31 am

Why continue this thread, when we all know he wont get banned this time?

Weiw · Post by **Weiw** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:09 am

Also.. Haakon is in Aardalsnett.

Its the same nett as many players. They all have the same ip. For some reason.. Zing Zachick Lighty Violent.. Ban one and the rest will be banned.
Not fair..

skmz · Post by **skmz** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:40 pm

Weiw wrote:Also.. Haakon is in Aardalsnett.

Its the same nett as many players. They all have the same ip. For some reason.. Zing Zachick Lighty Violent.. Ban one and the rest will be banned.
Not fair..

Why not? Their problem.

Lotus · Post by **Lotus** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:53 pm

Weiw wrote: Its the same nett as many players. They all have the same ip. For some reason.. Zing Zachick Lighty Violent.. Ban one and the rest will be banned.
Not fair..

If that's so, can't we have a vote on the player that we hate the most. And ban him. Knowing that the victim will get beat up by the remaining ones?

skmz · Post by **skmz** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:11 pm

Lotus wrote:
Weiw wrote: Its the same nett as many players. They all have the same ip. For some reason.. Zing Zachick Lighty Violent.. Ban one and the rest will be banned.
Not fair..
If that's so, can't we have a vote on the player that we hate the most. And ban him. Knowing that the victim will get beat up by the remaining ones?

What he said.

Pe0n · Post by **Pe0n** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:03 am

Lotus wrote:
Weiw wrote: Its the same nett as many players. They all have the same ip. For some reason.. Zing Zachick Lighty Violent.. Ban one and the rest will be banned.
Not fair..
If that's so, can't we have a vote on the player that we hate the most. And ban him. Knowing that the victim will get beat up by the remaining ones?

woha, lets do that. Sounds awesome.

emu · Post by **emu** » Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:29 am

Wouldn't surprise me 1 bit if he was cheating.

m1ndless · Post by **m1ndless** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:38 pm

emu wrote:Wouldn't surprise me 1 bit if he was cheating.

word yo

ZoRoXo · Post by **ZoRoXo** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:36 pm

emu wrote:Wouldn't surprise me 1 bit if he was cheating.

10pisk

Lotus · Post by **Lotus** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:16 pm