#Catch-Gamer

W1lco · Post by **W1lco** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:33 pm

50 ping.. i had 37 at tnx

ive got 50 at DA

.. well.. gg

nice to see an norweigan server up again

, new servers always makes me happy.. specially in this case.

Alien · Post by **Alien** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:55 pm

I can't understand why there is that R1Q2 thing. It just gives fake pings, I have 55-60 there (I bet it aint fake) but like others in our clan have something like 25-35 and it feels like ping 50-70 like they said.

Post by **Clown** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 3:07 pm

Ping it from a DOS box. The 'new' pings are proably more similar to those results than what they used to be, therefore giving a more accurate representation of your latency to the server.

kaaos · Post by **kaaos** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 3:14 pm

Remove votemap from the config, bloody noobs just keep on voting for cliff2 :/

Alien · Post by **Alien** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 4:18 pm

Well pinging from DOS box gives average of 34 ms. But if I watch netgraph, it's even bigger than in tnx (I had 55-65 ping @ tnx) so I bet I really have 60-70 ping there.

Post by **Haudrauf** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 4:37 pm

You can't compare tnx to catch...

i had about ping 120 on tnx.. (not talking of the in-game ping)
catch has about 35.

So.. what does your in-game ping on the catch-server tell you and what is your "dos"-ping to the catch-server like?
They should be similar, so we are alright.

Flunx · Post by **Flunx** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 5:24 pm

kaaos wrote:Remove votemap from the config, bloody noobs just keep on voting for cliff2 :/

haha agreed! Me, nova and nufan have carefully picked out the maps in the maprotation to try and make it nice for everyone from the cliff2 lovers to the lighthouse lovers :-)
So it's a bit frustrating when they votemap cliff2 as soon as a 'unpopular' map is loaded.

P.S. I don't mind having noobs at the server

Post by **imeiz** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 5:26 pm

compare your real ping on duraworks and catch to the ones you get by dos pinging, atleast that's what i'd do. i got 30ms ping on edome with ping, and on the gameserver it is 50 :p

kaaos · Post by **kaaos** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 6:24 pm

Flunx wrote:P.S. I don't mind having noobs at the server

Well yeah, when I say noob I don't actually mean a player who has just started playing AQ2. It's nicer to say noob than stupid cunt.

Kurupt · Post by **Kurupt** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 6:28 pm

ure such a stupid cunt kaaos!

kaaos · Post by **kaaos** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 6:35 pm

But I don't like cliff2

Blue Vex · Post by **Blue Vex** » Mon Dec 20, 2004 6:50 pm

Server ping owns. ;) (Fins and Dutchies has nothing to do on the server anyway. :P)
TnX's destruction was a good thing afterall. *Bows before the people who made this possible*

But (theres always a but)... I can't connect with Q2ACE, and skins are norse. :( I hope the skins will be changed soon. It would also be fun to see a complete list over the settings the server is running.

NeoFight · Post by **NeoFight** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 2:50 am

nice ping a bit better than the TNX servers

Samislide · Post by **Samislide** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 7:20 am

Damnit.. And I thought the Norwegians would be forced to play in BoomTown nowdays.

Dunno if it's better than TnX for me.. Long time since I played there, I guess it's pretty much the same.. 50-60 when I tried.

Kurupt · Post by **Kurupt** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 7:57 am

I'm glad you said that Blue Vex, luckily we don't have to play 1 map each vs Norwegian clans anymore then ;p

And indeed, norse must be the worst skins ever after the klauz shit they are using on bt ;)

#Catch-Gamer

arrr