Page 1 of 2

Sajhco feedback: Judging of [dP] vs .jpg

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:17 pm
by sajh
Situation:
jpg won the game vs [dP], one player failed to send demo upon request and thus breaking a rule.
Result:
jpg kept their win.
Facts:
3 admins were present and speccing during the game, none of which could see anything weird when speccing the one who didnt record.
Reasoning:
A missing could determine the outcome of a game if there is a suspicion of cheat. However the admins speccing could not see anything, and felt that this was enough not to enforce the rule.

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:28 pm
by Clown
I rarely record my games since it lags me and makes my game jerky, therefore I must be cheating.

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:40 pm
by Evilcina
maybe u should give some penalty points in future

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:44 pm
by dudemcpek
Correct decision, though you could punish the one who didn't record (or just didn't send) a demo. Give him one match ban or something.

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:59 pm
by Demoni
yeah, jpg can continue playing eventhough their player seemed to cheat and didnt record, still you are licking jpg:s ass and saying that its ok for them to continue. and in *RF* banning section one enemy lagged for one round MAX and we got banned from the whole cup... fair? :)

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:59 pm
by sayvzah
yes.

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:57 pm
by emperphis
Demos are a offline way to check someone's play. Since there were admins there and checked the player in question the whole time, there's no reason to force the rule.
But if the admins dodn't check his entire playing, that's another matter. Anyway i'd say that you could add an anticheat requirement for this specific player next games ;)

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 3:12 am
by L0ki
AssKick3r wrote:Correct decision, though you could punish the one who didn't record (or just didn't send) a demo. Give him one match ban or something.
Exactly my pov! A kind of "disciplinary measures".

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 5:38 am
by Den
Clown wrote:I rarely record my games since it lags me and makes my game jerky, therefore I must be cheating.
:tup:

ok

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 9:42 am
by Varne
Ok , First off :

"Facts:
3 admins were present and speccing during the game, none of which could see anything weird when speccing the one who didnt record. "

This is false ! There were NOT 3 admins speccing the whole game..

We got one demo of someone speccing "kotelsnurso" and that was like 3-5 min.. that is not proof enough imo !

This is just because some of .jpg members is aq2suomi admin.

The result should have been a rematch.. fair and square !

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 11:14 am
by Weiw
ehm. bad decision..

In the begging of the match I said 10 times that the rules say that everyone must take demo. There where no admins present during the first map.. I told how the rules where.. Our map on their server.. Their skin and team of choose.. on our map. Demo! everyone have to take demo.

Afther the demo I waned demos from 2 of the players. Kerex and KoteloNorsu. Why? because many of my m8ts complained in the cw that they got killed in many wired situations. Out from boxes. Out from walls. Up from soundless ladders. etc..

Kerex was nice. He sent me both the demos..
KoteloNorsu .. He was the fragwinner. I wanted his demo the most.
" [17:30] <KoteloNorsu> i was supposed to demo? :D "
" [17:31] <KoteloNorsu> I dont have a demo, didnt know im supposed to record that game :( " And this is after I told them to take demos! I dident type ready before everyone said yes..

" [17:44] <wLLsss> is it ok me to send demo where i recorded kotelo?P "
" [17:45] <KoteloNorsu> shut the fuck up, we have the demo lol "
" [17:52] <Solidas> if they show enough of kotelos playing, i will accept them as a substitute for his demos "
" [18:02] <wLLsss> http://www.kotiposti.net/helenamakinen/kotelonorsu.rar "

Well.. I have seen that demo..! You get to see 7-8 of KoteloNorsu`s 25++ kills.. And while being spect.. He suckt. I cant understand how a player like that becomes the fragwinner.. Spect 3-5 min at all on that demo.. Not a good KoteloNorsu demo..


There where 3 admins at the cw? for 2 mins maybe? where where 3 admins just in and out on the cw.. Maybe solidas where one whole map.. I don't know..

But Ive heard that KoteloNorsu was kicked from the cup.. why not get a rematch when we played a cw vs a banned player?

Solidas was a great guy.. he was ruling in my favor in the beginning.. but when jpg refused to play a rematch he ruled in jpgs favor..

[17:41] <Solidas> "If a clan fails to provide demos upon request by an admin during the qualification phase, they will be forced to forfeit their game."
[17:41] <Solidas> i can allow you to replay the game
[17:43] <Solidas> rematch, sorry jpg, but cant really make any exception to the rules
[17:43] <Solidas> and being an aq2suomi admin isnt an excuse not to record;)
[17:43] <Solidas> but i can allow you to replay the game, or forfeit
[17:45] <Solidas> weiw can chose to show sportsmanship and let this result stand, or demand a rematch
[17:46] <Weiw> Hell no.. not whit with that camping.. there is no sportsmanship in camping
[17:47] <Solidas> KoteloNorsu "Done by the players themselves, demos must be recorded by all players." ;)
[17:48] <Solidas> if you chose to replay, you may pick maps again.. sorry jpg, this is all i can do

I said rematch.

My point is that.. I said Many times in the beginning that everyone had to take demo.. How can one not understand that.. what reason does one have for not take the demo? (We played on a server without a proper anticheat system!) And the player was the fragleader and winner.
He got banned. So jpg played with a banned player.. If we see it like that! There is no harm in a rematch.. :) I know Ive been like a baby in this situation.. But I play on the fair side.. I hate when rewls are broken.

But we lost.. Not fair.. Not square. The best of luck to all players in Sajhco cup :)

you made the rules, not us!

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:14 pm
by zing84
the most important thing in a tournament is to follow the rules that`s made. The most fair thing would be a rematch and you all know it. or give dogpac walkover cause they followed the rhe rule "remember to make demo!!!"

I and [dP] respect the rules and so should jpg.

so admins out there give us a rematch, we don't whine.. we just want justice. simple as that. what if it had been ur clan fellows? think about it before u just say: yeye wathever the cup must go on it doesnt matter me blabla.

btw. ask one of the dogs of demo. the admins didnt spec more than 5mins. demo is proof enough to play this match all over again.

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:33 am
by Caracol
It's just racism against the dP homies.

KKKCo Cup, tss, tss.

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:42 pm
by Varne
It truly is ! DAMN YOU RACISTS ! DAMN YOU !

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:09 pm
by Jukasa
You just lost fair and square, why this whine?