Rules

Kurupt · Post by **Kurupt** » Sat Feb 21, 2004 6:59 pm

We now have the first version of the rules online. Next Wednesday we will review the rules intern, but for now I don't expect any major changes in it tho. To avoid the problems the European Action Quake League had we would like to have your suggestions / comments, before the first match week starts on 1 March 2004.

We got teams from different countries in the league so it probably won't be possible to please everyone, but if you miss something in the rules or you read something you totally disagree with, please post it here and we will take it into consideration.

The rules can be found here.

Thanks in advance.

IBA · Post by **IBA** » Sun Feb 22, 2004 10:13 am

hm ... =)

DaNi · Post by **DaNi** » Sun Feb 22, 2004 10:53 am

It looks fine to me

Vermin · Post by **Vermin** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 4:38 am

Hmm, I couldn't spot any modulate, picmip etc. limits or anything about modulate abusing.

birdie · Post by **birdie** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 8:13 am

Vermin wrote:Hmm, I couldn't spot any modulate, picmip etc. limits or anything about modulate abusing.

That's because there are foreingers playing

Post by **Den** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 8:19 am

birdie wrote:
Vermin wrote:Hmm, I couldn't spot any modulate, picmip etc. limits or anything about modulate abusing.

That's because there are foreingers playing

Eh?? i doubt it, there are only clans there who play on BT or eDome

Zonic · Post by **Zonic** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 10:22 am

Why use roundwins? Counting rounds means that clans has to play fast maps in case they loose the opponents map big.

I think percentage system is better. This way clans can play a slower map and still win the game.

But this is just my opinion.

Post by **arild** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 12:39 pm

Zonic wrote:Why use roundwins? Counting rounds means that clans has to play fast maps in case they loose the opponents map big.

I think percentage system is better. This way clans can play a slower map and still win the game.

But this is just my opinion.

agree

-Arild

Post by **Clement** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 1:09 pm

Ok Dupond and Dupont..

Anyways.. cw's have always been played 2x20 mins - most rounds win, and we feel that's a fine way to play the game.. but don't get me wrong - I loved the 4x15 map wins NAQL system, but lets try this one for a change

Repsaj · Post by **Repsaj** » Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:43 am

Morpher wrote:Ok Dupond and Dupont..

Anyways.. cw's have always been played 2x20 mins - most rounds win, and we feel that's a fine way to play the game.. but don't get me wrong - I loved the 4x15 map wins NAQL system, but lets try this one for a change

*cough cough* i think it were the scandnavian guys that introduced the round wins it was always known to be mapwins

Post by **Clement** » Tue Feb 24, 2004 6:24 am

Kurupt · Post by **Kurupt** » Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:48 am

Eh it was more like... only the UK who used the map wins thingy, and some dutch clans I guess

Zonic · Post by **Zonic** » Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:57 am

Morpher wrote:Ok Dupond and Dupont..

Anyways.. cw's have always been played 2x20 mins - most rounds win, and we feel that's a fine way to play the game.. but don't get me wrong - I loved the 4x15 map wins NAQL system, but lets try this one for a change

I didn't mention the 4*15 maps system... I said percentage system.

Just calculate the % from two maps and determine the winner like that.

But sure, lets give roundwins a try.