Untouchable and Immortal by cTr0'
Moderator: Moderators
Untouchable and Immortal by cTr0'
wohoo... yes i made it, after 1 month work i finished it and now u can download it !
http://quadaver.net/CtroProductions
hf :>
http://quadaver.net/CtroProductions
hf :>
#action.one <-> quakenet
if the link on that page didnt work use this
http://www.own-age.com/vids/video.aspx?id=3833
http://www.own-age.com/vids/video.aspx?id=3833
#action.one <-> quakenet
I know that it's a hard work. It costs a lot of time and it's great that you spend it on it. But after watching hundreds of vids i think to see more and more things creators do out of ignorance about the auditory :-(.
Some criticising opinions about yours:
- first sequence: why not to use the inventive console idea from the trailer, never seen in a frag vid before (damn, me == too slow (: ) instead of this beautiful effect? That's what I really hate, to face these effects again and again. Do u just copy the others? Dont think so. Was it an attempt to use this effect better than the others? On footage from modern true 32 bit engine, compressed with a lossless codec? Don't believe that. Whaz then?
- title: placed at 3:40, half of the movie just the intro?
- 3:55: quad.chris1 on the middle of the screen for 5 seconds. Whaz that? Just to go shure that the audience remember who was fragging? Specially for those who skip the beautiful credits? Same quad.cTr0 headline is missing than, somehow inconsistent u know.
- soundtrack: completely unmatching, no synching at all results in a feeling watching muted tv and listening radio at the same time, first track like low qualy live record, second like from another universe, third from hell...
- overall: somehow too long, somehow similar frags, maybe couse of the same persons fragging (like sniping in right to the left mouse movement of chris), maybe couse of the lack of recams, maybe couse of the well known effects
Some criticising opinions about yours:
- first sequence: why not to use the inventive console idea from the trailer, never seen in a frag vid before (damn, me == too slow (: ) instead of this beautiful effect? That's what I really hate, to face these effects again and again. Do u just copy the others? Dont think so. Was it an attempt to use this effect better than the others? On footage from modern true 32 bit engine, compressed with a lossless codec? Don't believe that. Whaz then?
- title: placed at 3:40, half of the movie just the intro?
- 3:55: quad.chris1 on the middle of the screen for 5 seconds. Whaz that? Just to go shure that the audience remember who was fragging? Specially for those who skip the beautiful credits? Same quad.cTr0 headline is missing than, somehow inconsistent u know.
- soundtrack: completely unmatching, no synching at all results in a feeling watching muted tv and listening radio at the same time, first track like low qualy live record, second like from another universe, third from hell...
- overall: somehow too long, somehow similar frags, maybe couse of the same persons fragging (like sniping in right to the left mouse movement of chris), maybe couse of the lack of recams, maybe couse of the well known effects
-
- blew up
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 10:22 am
- Location: fi
Very nice video, IMO there wasn't too much effects used. Most of the frags could have been better, but I guess the main point is that it contained a lot of action. AND the 2 first songs ruled, seems like I'm the opposite partie compared to the others who has commented cB
MarlPoro / Anxiety
Thanks for reading
Thanks for reading
-
- blew up
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 10:22 am
- Location: fi