I think Den could fix that url. And about the avatar, battyboy battyboy!!
No seriously, we thought about it before. Actually we made some rules at the start of this forum, like the size of the avatar (90 pixels square). Most users got avatars that are bigger then this, but we didn't do anything against it to keep everything nice and friendly. Maybe we should start deleting avatars that are too big and/or don't belong on a board like this.
I don't want to point any fingers, but if you want to look serious perhaps you should consider either deleting the babe post or delete the rule that reads: "Members should remember this board is aimed at a general audience. Posting pornographic or generally offensive text, images, links, etc. will not be tolerated and will lead to a warning."
After all clowneh is right, it's supposed to be aimed at all ages right?
It's not really the age thing that I'm worried about. It's just generally the fact that my boss my catch me looking at something inappropriate. If it was up to me, I'd let kids look at sexy women
Clowneh! wrote:It's not really the age thing that I'm worried about. It's just generally the fact that my boss my catch me looking at something inappropriate. If it was up to me, I'd let kids look at sexy women
Your too kind
But i must agree if u dont allow avatars like that the babe post hs to go
Well, I just looked at the babes thread. Theres no nudity (nips and lips) apart from the link in the first post. Maybe all they have to do it edit that first post?